From minimal consensus to maximum dissent
Abstract
The article starts with a critical synopsis of the five main strategies of psychotherapy integration to date: theoretical integration, common factors, eclecticism, metadisciplinary integration and the search for a common language. They each succumb to a pervasive, but epistemologically unreflected claim for unification. Subsequently, an epistemological frame is proposed that allows for psychotherapy to keep her characteristic differentiation, but at the same time provides her with a specific mode of legitimization as a scientific discipline. It is suggested that particular therapeutic schools accept the heterogeneity of the field, and enter into a dialogue with others; this dialogue is structured according to specific criteria by virtue of which each school can develop a deeper knowledge of the background assumptions it is based upon. The future potential for an open process of psychotherapy integration can best emerge from such encounters between therapeutic schools which are mutually enhancing the understanding of their irreducible (meta-)theoretical differences and limitations.
Keywords
Epistemology, psychotherapy integration.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This journal provides open access to its content in accordance with the basic premise that the free public availability of research benefits the exchange of knowledge throughout the world.
Authors wishing to publish in this journal agree to the following:
- The author/s retain/s the copyrights and consent/s to initial publication of the work in the journal under a Creative Commons Attribution licence, which allows third parties to use the work by citing the name/s of the author/s and this journal as initial publisher (in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 DE-Licence).
- The author/s can enter into additional contracts for the non-exclusive distribution (e.g. publish in a collection or book) of the version published in the journal, if the journal is cited as initial publisher.