Does psychoanalysis have to change? Conclusions from empirical psychotherapy research
Abstract
The basis of this article is the recent (controversial) discussion around the effectiveness of different forms of psychotherapy as well as the demand for a “general psychotherapy”. It is shown that psychoanalysis seems to understand itself as a “victim” of the public discussion and is endangered to avoid dealing with the methods and results of psychotherapy research. It is plead to use these results to critically evaluate the of treatment model of psychoanalysis. Orlinsky and Howard's “generic model of psychotherapy” could be a useful tool for this purpose. A change of psychoanalysis should occur as far as its relationship towards empirical research is concerned. This can be demonstrated using the gap which still exists between research in psychotherapy and psychotherapeutic practice and which - in view of the present health political developments - has to be bridged sooner or later.
Keywords:
Psychoanalysis, psychotherapy research, summary of research findings, generic model of psychotherapy, research-practice-relationship.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This journal provides open access to its content in accordance with the basic premise that the free public availability of research benefits the exchange of knowledge throughout the world.
Authors wishing to publish in this journal agree to the following:
- The author/s retain/s the copyrights and consent/s to initial publication of the work in the journal under a Creative Commons Attribution licence, which allows third parties to use the work by citing the name/s of the author/s and this journal as initial publisher (in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 DE-Licence).
- The author/s can enter into additional contracts for the non-exclusive distribution (e.g. publish in a collection or book) of the version published in the journal, if the journal is cited as initial publisher.