For a scientific psychotherapy
Abstract
Does psychotherapy have a right to call itself a science, now that it seems to be so split upI In the present article the author proposes a number of criteria that should possibly be required for a psychotherapeutic model to be considered scientific. The model should have the ability to operate as a critical method and, more basically, to formulate theoretical proposals relative to the reality of psychotherapy; it should also enunciate specific rules concerning their validation. These rules need not necessarily be similar to those of theoretico-experimental methods and may vary from one model to the next. In this connection, the author stresses the need to reflect the ideas of “belief” and of “pre-assumption” that always influence the scientific construction of a psychotherapeutic model and its method of validation.
Keywords:
Epistemology, compared psychotherapy, scientific validation.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This journal provides open access to its content in accordance with the basic premise that the free public availability of research benefits the exchange of knowledge throughout the world.
Authors wishing to publish in this journal agree to the following:
- The author/s retain/s the copyrights and consent/s to initial publication of the work in the journal under a Creative Commons Attribution licence, which allows third parties to use the work by citing the name/s of the author/s and this journal as initial publisher (in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 DE-Licence).
- The author/s can enter into additional contracts for the non-exclusive distribution (e.g. publish in a collection or book) of the version published in the journal, if the journal is cited as initial publisher.