In Favour of Ethics of Physical Touch
Abstract
The research paper explores, if and how far it might be necessary for analytical body-psychotherapy to have its own therapeutic ethics. The term "abstinence" is also valid in this case; however, it does not conform to the strict no-touch rule as used in classical psychoanalysis. The realm of options and of what i s permitted or even required, can be expanded through physical touch, offered with discipline, guided by training, intuition, and personal experience on the part of the analyst, including examples of interaction between mother or father and child, as found in infant-research.So-called minor ethical problems of the therapy which lie beneath the level of sexual, aggressive or narcissistic abuse are discussed in detail.
Keywords:
Ethics; Abstinence; Physical touch; Body-psychotherapy.
Downloads
Published
2003-10-01
How to Cite
Moser, T. (2003). In Favour of Ethics of Physical Touch. Psychotherapie-Wissenschaft, 11(4), 173–181. Retrieved from https://psychotherapie-wissenschaft.info/article/view/415
Issue
Section
Special Issue
License
This journal provides open access to its content in accordance with the basic premise that the free public availability of research benefits the exchange of knowledge throughout the world.
Authors wishing to publish in this journal agree to the following:
- The author/s retain/s the copyrights and consent/s to initial publication of the work in the journal under a Creative Commons Attribution licence, which allows third parties to use the work by citing the name/s of the author/s and this journal as initial publisher (in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 DE-Licence).
- The author/s can enter into additional contracts for the non-exclusive distribution (e.g. publish in a collection or book) of the version published in the journal, if the journal is cited as initial publisher.