How to turn Popper’s philosophical baton against psychoanalysis into a flower bouquet – an epistemological essay on psychotherapy

Authors

  • Kurt Greiner

Keywords:

Key words, Karl R. Popper, Psychoanalysis, Adlerian Psychology, Philosophy of Science, Pseudoscience, Science, Text Hermeneutics, Logopoietics, Psycho Narrative Networks, Problematic Client’s Texts, Psycho Terminological Horizon and Purpose

Abstract

When talking to psychoanalysts, a major uncertainty regarding the scientific nature of psychoanalytical activities again and again becomes evident. This methodological uncertainty can partly be traced back to Viennese philosopher Karl R. Popper (1902–1994) who almost 100 years ago scathingly criticized the then newly developed psychotherapeutic methods of psychoanalysis (based on S. Freud) and individual psychology (based on A. Adler) and tried to expose them as pseudoscience. The essay at hand aims at showing under which conditions and in which way Popper’s epistemological criticism of psychoanalysis and individual psychology, developed at the beginning of the 20th century, actually supports the text hermeneutic nature of the first two psychoanalytical methods today.

Author Biography

Kurt Greiner

Kurt Greiner, Univ.-Prof. DDr., lehrt an der Sigmund-Freud-Privatuniversität Wien (SFU) und forscht im dortigen Fachbereich Psychotherapiewissenschaftstheorie und Therapieschulenforschungsmethodologie.

Published

2017-12-15

How to Cite

Greiner, K. (2017). How to turn Popper’s philosophical baton against psychoanalysis into a flower bouquet – an epistemological essay on psychotherapy. Psychotherapie-Wissenschaft, 7(2), 77–83. Retrieved from https://psychotherapie-wissenschaft.info/article/view/1776