Some contributions on the topic of research published in the Italian journal Psicoterapia e Scienze Umane («Psychotherapy and the Human Sciences»)

Alcune pubblicazioni sul tema della ricerca apparse sulla rivista Psicoterapia e Scienze Umane
www.psicoterapiaescienzeumane.it

edited by / a cura di Paolo Migone

2001, 35(4), 5–58

Drew Westen, Lo status scientifico dei processi inconsci: Freud é davvero morto? [original edition: (1999). The scientific status of unconscious processes: Is Freud really dead? Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 47(4), 1061–1106].

2005, 39(1), 7–90

Drew Westen, Kate Morrison Novotny & Heather Thompson-Brenner, Lo statuto empirico delle psicoterapie validate empiricamente: assunti, risultati e pubblicazione delle ricerche [original edition: (2004). The empirical status of empirically supported psychotherapies: as-sumptions, findings, and reporting in controlled clinical trials. Psychological Bulletin, 130(4), 631–663; una sintesi a cura di Paolo Migone: www.psychomedia.it/pm/modther/probpsiter/ruoloter/rt98-05.htm.]

2010, 44(1), 9–34

Jonathan Shedler, L’efficacia della terapia psicodinamica [original edition: (2010). The efficacy of psychodynamic psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 65(2), 98–109].

2011, 45(2), 153–180

Paul L. Wachtel, Al di là degli «EST». Problemi di una pratica psicoterapeutica basata sulle evidenze [original edition: (2010). Beyond «ESTs». Problematic assumptions in the pursuit of evidence-based practice. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 27(3) 251–272].

2013, 47(3), 407–422

American Psychological Association, Riconoscimento dell’efficacia della psicoterapia [original edition: (2013). Recognition of psychotherapy effectiveness. Psychotherapy, 50(1), 102–109].

2015, 49(4), 595–628

Rolf Sandell, Change After Psychotherapy (CHAP): un metodo di valutazione del cambiamento alla fine della psicoterapia [original edition: Change After Psychotherapy (CHAP): A method for measuring change after the termination of psychotherapy. See the web page: www.psicoterapiaescienzeumane.it/chap2015.htm].

2016, 50(1), 11–48

Nathan Thoma, Brian Pilecki & Dean McKay, La terapia cognitivo-comportamentale contemporanea: teoria, storia ed evidenze empiriche [original edition: (2015). Contemporary cognitive-behavior therapy: A review of theory, history, and evidence. Psychodynamic Psychiatry, 43(3), 423–462].

2017, 51(2), 187–210

Horst Kächele, Lo studio del caso singolo dalla ricerca clinica alla ricerca sperimentale: un eterno dilemma? [From case study to single case research: A perennial issue?].

2017, 51(4)

Paolo Migone, Editoriale (pp. 525–528): www.francoangeli.it/Area_RivistePDF/getArticolo.ashx?idArticolo=60389

David M. Clark, Il programma inglese «Improving Access to Psychological Therapies» (IAPT) (pp. 529–550) [later English edition: (2018). Realizing the mass public benefit of evidence-based psychological therapies: The IAPT program. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 14, 159–183].

Falk Leichsenring & Christiane Steinert, La terapia cognitivo-comportamentale è veramente la più efficace? (pp. 551–558) [Is cognitive behavior therapy really the most effective form of psychotherapy?].

2018, 52(3), 383–398

Jonathan Shedler, Dove sono le evidenze della terapia «basata sulle evidenze»? [original edition: (2018). Where is the evidence for «evidence-based» therapy? Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 41(2), 319–329].

Refbacks

  • Im Moment gibt es keine Refbacks


Copyright (c) 2019 Paolo Migone

Lizenz-URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/de/